Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse ALL STUDIES
Keyword Search
View All Selected
Clear All
Login / Create Account
Login
Create Account
Home
About Us
Privacy Policy
Minimum System Requirements
How To Join
Mission
Data Sponsors
Researchers
How It Works
How to Request Data
Review of Requests
Data Sharing Agreement
Access to Data
Independent Review Panel
Metrics
FAQs
News
Help/Contact Us
A study on the possible association between antidepressant response to SSRIs and proneness for side effects
Proposal
1103
Title of Proposed Research
A study on the possible association between antidepressant response to SSRIs and proneness for side effects
Lead Researcher
Elias Eriksson, MD, PhD
Affiliation
University of GothenburgGothenburg, Sweden
Funding Source
Sponsors are the Swedish Medical Research Council, Bertil Hållsten's Foundation and Torsten & Ragnar Söderberg's Foundation. There is no commercial sponsor.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Lead Researcher: Elias Eriksson has been on advisory boards and received speaker's honoraria from Lundbeck, Lilly, Servier and JanssenCilag.
Since the SSRIs are no longer patent protected, the commercial implications of this project are close to zero. GSK and other companies are (and have been) requested to provide us with data files, but do not provide any other support, and have no commercial interest in the outcome
Data Sharing Agreement Date
Lay Summary
BACKGRUND, RATIONAL AND AIM
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are first line of treatment for depression. In many countries, between 5-10% of the adult population are treated with these compounds.
Recently, however, the SSRIs have been questioned, some suggesting that they are devoid of specific antidepressant effects. According to these critics, the reason that patients with depression in placebo-controlled trials are more improved than those on placebo may be due to the fact that the presence of side effects make those on active treatment realize that they are not given placebo which may enhance the placebo effect. SSRIs outperforming placebo may hence, according to these writers, not be due to their effects on brain neurotransmission but a psychological result of their side effects.
If antidepressants exert a genuine, pharmacological antidepressant effect or not is a matter of considerable importance. In case the current questioning of these drugs is justified, and their apparent antidepressant effect is merely secondary to their side effects, their current wide spread use should be reconsidered. On the other hand, if the questioning is unfounded, it is important that this becomes clarified, so that doctors do not refrain from prescribing these drugs to patients needing them.
PROJECT PLAN
In an on-going project, we are making attempts to shed further light on why some SSRI trials fail to reveal a difference between active drug and placebo. For this purpose, pharmaceutical companies have provided us with patient-level data from controlled trials regarding the SSRIs paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram and escitalopram.
So far, our analyses have been focussed i) on how the outcome of SSRI trials are influenced by the shortcomings marring the most commonly used instrument for symptom assessment, i e the HDRS), and ii) the possible relationship between symptom profile at inclusion and response. In the subproject for which we now request data we will address the possibility association between side effects and response.
GSK has already kindly provided us with patient-level efficacy data from all the selected studies, as well as certain other relevant variables. What we now request, in order to perform the planned study, is i) patient level-based side effect data and ii) information on body weight (enabling us to adjust for differences in drug exposure).
These side-effect data will be used to examine to what extent spontaneously reported side effects are positively associated with response, both when assessed using the traditional primary effect parameter, i.e. the sum of the rating for all items on the instrument used for symptom assessment (which will usually be the Hamilton Depression rating scale) or various items or subscales extracted from this scale. Aspects such as age, gender, dose, body weight, length of treatment and premature discontinuation (i.e. drop-out) will also be taken into consideration.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 1617, "Title": "GSK-29060/785", "Description": "A double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dosage study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine CR and citalopram to placebo in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder with anxiety" },{ "PostingID": 1633, "Title": "GSK-29060/448", "Description": "A Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effects of Immediate Release Paroxetine and Modified Release Paroxetine in the Treatment of Major Depression" },{ "PostingID": 1634, "Title": "GSK-29060/449", "Description": "A Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effects of Immediate Release Paroxetine and Modified Release Paroxetine in the Treatment of Major Depression" },{ "PostingID": 1638, "Title": "GSK-29060/810", "Description": "A double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm, fixed-dose study of 12.5 mg/day and 25mg/day Paroxetine CR in the treatment of Major Depression." },{ "PostingID": 1639, "Title": "GSK-29060/874", "Description": "Assessment of Paxil CR, 12.5 and 25 mg/day in treating elderly patients with major depression" },{ "PostingID": 2122, "Title": "GSK-29060/01/001", "Description": "A Phase II, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Paroxetine in Depressed Outpatients" },{ "PostingID": 2123, "Title": "GSK-29060/02/001", "Description": "A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Paroxetine in Depressed Outpatients" },{ "PostingID": 2124, "Title": "GSK-29060/03/001", "Description": "A Double-Blind, Imipramine- and Placebo-Controlled Study of Paroxetine in Depressed Outpatients" },{ "PostingID": 2126, "Title": "GSK-29060/009", "Description": "A Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Fixed-dose Evaluation of Four Doses of Paroxetine" },{ "PostingID": 2131, "Title": "GSK-29060/006", "Description": "A study to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of paroxetine by double-blind comparison with placebo
Medicine: paroxetine, Condition: Depressive Disorder, Major, Phase: 3, Clinical Study ID: 29060/006, Sponsor: GSK" },{ "PostingID": 2133, "Title": "GSK-29060/276", "Description": "A double-blind study to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Paroxetine in the treatment of depression in comparison with placebo" },{ "PostingID": 2134, "Title": "GSK-29060/012_3", "Description": "A Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Tolerance of Paroxetine by Double-Blind Comparison with Placebo and Mianserin" },{ "PostingID": 2137, "Title": "GSK-29060/487", "Description": "A Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effects of Immediate Release Paroxetine and Controlled Release Paroxetine in the Treatment of Major Depression in Elderly Patients" },{ "PostingID": 2138, "Title": "GSK-29060/625", "Description": "A double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-centre study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Paroxetine in the treatment of post-stroke depression." }]
Statistical Analysis Plan
A necessary first step will be to classify and group the reported side-effects for all patients based on, for example, severity, duration and frequency into an aggregated side-effect score. As the nature of the side-effect data is as yet not known to us, it is impossible to provide specific details as to how exactly this will be accomplished. The primary measure of efficacy will be the absolute difference in i) the single item "depressed mood", ii) the HDRS-17 sum and iii) established subscales thereof. If the HDRS-17 is not included in the pertinent study, the primary measure of efficacy used in that study, as well as established subscales of the corresponding rating instrument, will be used. The mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) will be the primary statistical strategy. First we will conduct an MMRM-analysis without the treatment-group factor but with the side-effect predictor(s) included, as well as other covariates that might be of interest (e.g., baseline score on the rating instrument used), to investigate whether or not side-effects is a significant predictor for the model. Secondly, the model will be expanded to include also the treatment group factor as well as the appropriate interactions. Finally, as it is reasonable to assume that the reported side-effects will be different, in both quantitative and qualitative terms, between active-drug and placebo, it might be necessary to perform stratified analyses to study the effect of specific side-effects on each treatment-group separately.
Publication Citation
https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.147
© 2024 ideaPoint. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by ideaPoint.
Help
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Help and Resources