Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse ALL STUDIES
Keyword Search
View All Selected
Clear All
Login / Create Account
Login
Create Account
Home
About Us
Privacy Policy
Minimum System Requirements
How To Join
Mission
Data Sponsors
Researchers
How It Works
How to Request Data
Review of Requests
Data Sharing Agreement
Access to Data
Independent Review Panel
Metrics
FAQs
News
Help/Contact Us
Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Osteoporosis In Chronic Kidney Disease: an Individual Patient Level Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
Proposal
1749
Title of Proposed Research
Bisphosphonates for the Treatment of Osteoporosis In Chronic Kidney Disease: an Individual Patient Level Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
Lead Researcher
Dr. David Collister
Affiliation
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, affiliated to Research St. Joseph's - Hamilton
Funding Source
None
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Data Sharing Agreement Date
14 August 2018
Lay Summary
Kidney disease is public health concern that affects 10-15% of the population that is driven by aging, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Kidney disease including dialysis is associated with an increased risk of fractures due an underlying bone disease caused by kidney disease itself referred to as the “mineral bone disorder.” Osteoporosis (OP) is a common bone disease that is due to a structural abnormality related to a decrease in bone density that can also contribute to fractures. aging is a shared risk factor for both OP and kidney disease with an overlap between these conditions. However, the extent of OP in individuals with kidney disease is uncertain using bone mineral density (BMD) testing to diagnose is not reliable due to interference by calcium deposition but it is thought to frequently coexist in the elderly with kidney disease. In the general population, ”bisphosphonates” are a class of medication that increase BMD in different skeletal sites (hip, spine, wrist etc.) and prevent fractures at these sites. However, how well these medcations work and their safety profiles in the setting of kidney disease is uncertain. This is because patients with kidney dysfunction have been systematically excluded from studies of these drugs as they are dosed based on kidney function. Bisphosphonates are also associated with adverse events including different types of kidney injury and bone related complications which may be modified by the presence of underlying kidney disease. Thus, these drugs have yet to be fully studied in the kidney disease population although they are frequently used off-label in special circumstances. Further research needs to be done to improve the outcomes of patients with kidney disease and OP. The goal of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous clinical trials of bisphosphonates compared to placebo which have included a number of patients with kidney disease. We want to compare the subgroup of participants with kidney dysfunction and this requires individual patient level data to identify kidney dysfunction using formulas that include demographic information (age, sex, race) and laboratory tests of kidney function. The objective is to see if there are any differences in the outcomes of patients with or without kidney diseases across the different types of bisphosphonates. We have already identified 38 studies that meet the inclusion criteria into our study including 8 bisphosphontes (alendronate, risedroante, etidronate, minodronate, tiludronate, ibandronate, zoledronic acid , clodronate) and are at the point of collecting data from individual studies.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 2215, "Title": "ROCHE-MF4411", "Description": "Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study on the efficacy and safety of ibandronate over 3 years in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using a continuous oral and an intermittent oral dosing regimen.
Medicine: ibandronate, Condition: osteoporosis with pathological fracture, Phase: 3, Clinical Study ID: MF4411, Sponsor: Roche" },{ "PostingID": 2216, "Title": "ROCHE-MF4380", "Description": "Efficacy and safety of long-term, intermittent iv ibandronate treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Medicine: ibandronate, Condition: osteoporosis with pathological fracture, Phase: 3, Clinical Study ID: MF4380, Sponsor: Roche" },{ "PostingID": 3441, "Title": "GSK-BON103593", "Description": "A one year, parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study to assess the effect of monthly 150mg oral ibandronate dosing versus placebo on bone quality and strength at the proximal femur in women with osteoporosis" },{ "PostingID": 4189, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CZOL446H2310", "Description": "Multinational, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study assessing the efficacy of intravenous zoledronic acid in preventing subsequent osteoporotic fractures after a hip fracture" },{ "PostingID": 4190, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CZOL446H2301", "Description": "A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women taking cal-cium and vitamin D" },{ "PostingID": 4195, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CZOL446M2309", "Description": "A Two Year Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Fracture Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Zoledronic Acid 5 mg Annually for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men" },{ "PostingID": 4676, "Title": "ROCHE-BA18492", "Description": "Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ibandronate Once Monthly in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia
Medicine: Ibandronate, Condition: osteoporosis with pathological fracture, Phase: 4, Clinical Study ID: BA18492, Sponsor: Roche" },{ "PostingID": 4677, "Title": "ROCHE-MF4433", "Description": "Double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized study on the efficacy and safety of ibandronate during 2 years treatment in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using a continuous oral (0.5mg daily) and in intermittent oral (20mg every 2nd day for 24 days every 3 months) regimen.
Medicine: Ibandronate, Condition: osteoporosis with pathological fracture, Phase: 2, Clinical Study ID: MF4433, Sponsor: Roche" },{ "PostingID": 4678, "Title": "ROCHE-MF4470", "Description": "Multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, dose-finding study on the efficacy and safety of ibandronate (BM 21.0955) during 2 years treatment in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis using an intermittent (every 3 months) i.v. injection of 1 mg or 2 mg.
Medicine: Ibandronate, Condition: osteoporosis with pathological fracture, Phase: 2, Clinical Study ID: MF4470, Sponsor: Roche" },{ "PostingID": 4679, "Title": "ROCHE-MF4488", "Description": "Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized dose-finding study on the efficacy and safety of ibandronate during 2 years treatment in potmenopausal women for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss using an intermittent i.v. bolus injection of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg regimen every three months
Medicine: Ibandronate, Condition: osteoporosis with pathological fracture, Phase: 2/3, Clinical Study ID: MF4488, Sponsor: Roche" },{ "PostingID": 4753, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CZOL446N2312", "Description": "A 2-year Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Zoledronic Acid 5 mg Administered Either Annually at Randomization and 12 Months, or Administered at Randomization Only in the Prevention of Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia" }]
Statistical Analysis Plan
Given the primary and secondary outcomes, the effect measure of interest is the relative risk for events and adverse events as well as percentage change for BMD testing from baseline to follow-up without repeated measures comparisons with BMD as a continuous variable. As all studies are randomized controlled trials, we will not be performing any methods to control for bias. We will perform planned adjustments for covariates similar to adjusted analyses in each individual study. We will be using a frequentist statistical approach with a meta-analyses of aggregate estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects method We will perform a sensitivity analyses for studies at a low risk of bias assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias. A Cochran Q test will be conducted to assess heterogeneity and an I2 statistic will be calculated to estimate the percentage of total variation resulting from between-study variation. We will perform subgroup analyses by chronic kidney disease staging including stages 3,4,5 (estimated GFR of 59-30, 29-15, <15ml/min/1.73m2 respectively) as well as usuing eGFR as a a continuous variable with other subgroups including dialysis, gender, osteopenia versus osteoporosis, fracture status, route of bisphosphonate adminsitration (oral versus intravenous) and type of bisphosphonate. Missing data will be handled as described in each original study and we will not be any additional adjustment such as a last carry forward approach or multiple inputation. All statistical analyses will be the software provided.
Publication Citation
Whitlock R, MacDonald K, Tangri N, Walsh M, Collister D. The Efficacy and Safety of Bisphosphonate Therapy for Osteopenia/Osteoporosis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trials. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease. 2024;11.
DOI: 10.1177/20543581241283523
© 2024 ideaPoint. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by ideaPoint.
Help
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Help and Resources