Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse ALL STUDIES
Keyword Search
View All Selected
Clear All
Login / Create Account
Login
Create Account
Home
About Us
Privacy Policy
Minimum System Requirements
How To Join
Mission
Data Sponsors
Researchers
How It Works
How to Request Data
Review of Requests
Data Sharing Agreement
Access to Data
Independent Review Panel
Metrics
FAQs
News
Help/Contact Us
Comparison of the effects of dual and single bronchodilators in COPD patients relocated from group D to group B by the revised 2017 GOLD classification: a post-hoc pooled analysis of global RCTs
Proposal
5742
Title of Proposed Research
Comparison of the effects of dual and single bronchodilators in COPD patients relocated from group D to group B by the revised 2017 GOLD classification: a post-hoc pooled analysis of global RCTs
Lead Researcher
Yeon-Mok Oh
Affiliation
Professor, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaHead, the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
Funding Source
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Data Sharing Agreement Date
15 February 2019
Lay Summary
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. For its treatment, bronchodilators are the most important pharmacological agents. These medications which usually used in the form of an inhaler relax smooth muscles of the airways and help relieve shortness of breath. Two types of bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action are used for the treatment of COPD: beta-2 agonist, and muscarinic antagonist. A beta-2 agonist activates beta adrenergic receptors of smooth muscles leading to dilation of the airways (bronchodilation). A muscarinic antagonist blocks muscarinic cholinergic receptors and produces bronchodilation. During the recent years, combinations of these two distinct types of bronchodilator, called as dual bronchodilators (fixed-dose combinations of long-acting beta-2 agonist and long-acting muscarinic antagonist) have been introduced in the market from several pharmaceutical companies.Although efficacy and safety of dual bronchodilators compared with single bronchodilators have been shown, not every patient with COPD is treated with dual bronchodilators. The most widely used COPD guidelines recommend that a certain group of patients be treated with a dual bronchodilator as an initial medication and others start their medication with a single bronchodilator. The distinction between groups was made based on lung function, number of acute deteriorating events (i.e., acute exacerbation) in the preceding year, and patients' symptoms. The recent revision of the guidelines in 2017 has removed lung function from the grouping criteria; and this change has caused a reduction in the number of patients whose initial recommended choice of treatment is a dual bronchodilator. In other words, some patients who would have been indicated for and benefited from use of dual bronchodilators if the classification system had not been revised are now prescribed with a single bronchodilator. It is regrettable for physicians to see a decrease in the number of patients who may benefit from dual bronchodilators, as they are more potent than single bronchodilators. We aimed to determine the role of dual bronchodilators in patients who are not indicated for dual bronchodilators by the 2017 revised guidelines but who would have been indicated for them by the previous guidelines. The hypothesis is that early use of dual bronchodilators would improve lung function, improve patient-reported outcomes, and decrease the occurrence of acute exacerbations.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 1556, "Title": "GSK-DB2113373", "Description": "A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK573719/GW642444 Inhalation Powder and the Individual Components Delivered Once-Daily via a Novel Dry Powder Inhaler in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" },{ "PostingID": 1641, "Title": "GSK-DB2113374", "Description": "A multi-center trial comparing the efficacy and safety of GSK573719/GW642444 with GSK573719 and with tiotropium over 24 weeks in subjects with COPD" },{ "PostingID": 1642, "Title": "GSK-DB2113360", "Description": "A multicenter trial comparing the efficacy and safety of GSK573719/GW642444 with GW642444 and with tiotropium over 24 weeks in subjects with COPD" },{ "PostingID": 3671, "Title": "GSK-ZEP117115", "Description": "A multicenter, trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg once daily with Tiotropium 18 mcg once daily over 24 weeks in subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)." },{ "PostingID": 3876, "Title": "BI-1237.5", "Description": "Tiotropium+Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)" },{ "PostingID": 3877, "Title": "BI-1237.6", "Description": "Tiotropium +Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus Tiotropium and Olodaterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)" },{ "PostingID": 3878, "Title": "BI-1237.25", "Description": "Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (OTEMTO 1)" },{ "PostingID": 3879, "Title": "BI-1237.26", "Description": "Tiotropium+Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (OTEMTO 2)" },{ "PostingID": 4392, "Title": "BI-1237.22", "Description": "Japan Long-term Safety for Tiotropium Plus Olodaterol" },{ "PostingID": 16076, "Title": "BI-1237.16", "Description": "To Evaluate the Effect of Inhaled Medication Together With Exercise and Activity Training on Exercise Capacity and Daily Activities in Patients With Chronic Lung Disease With Obstruction of Airways" },{ "PostingID": 16077, "Title": "BI-1237.19", "Description": "A Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effect of 52 Weeks of Once Daily Treatment of Orally Inhaled Tiotropium + Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination Compared With Tiotropium on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation in Patients With Severe to Very Severe COPD. [DYNAGITO]" },{ "PostingID": 16129, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A2303", "Description": "A 26-week Treatment Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo and Active Controlled (Open Label) Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of QVA149 (110/50 μg q.d.) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)" },{ "PostingID": 16130, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A2339", "Description": "A Placebo and Active Controlled Study to Assess the Long-term Safety of Once Daily QVA149 for 52 Weeks in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients With Moderate to Severe Airflow Limitation" },{ "PostingID": 16131, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A2336", "Description": "A 12-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo and Active Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Indacaterol Maleate / Glycopyrronium Bromide in COPD Patients With Moderate to Severe Airflow Limitation." },{ "PostingID": 16132, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A2337", "Description": "A 12-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo and Active Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Indacaterol Maleate / Glycopyrronium Bromide in COPD Patients With Moderate to Severe Airflow Limitation" },{ "PostingID": 16133, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A2304", "Description": "A 64-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of QVA149 (110/50 μg o.d.) vs NVA237 (50 μg o.d.) and Open-label Tiotropium (18 μg o.d.) on COPD Exacerbations in Patients With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)" },{ "PostingID": 16134, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A1301", "Description": "A 52-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Long Term Safety and Tolerability of QVA149 (110 Mcg Indacaterol / 50 Mcg Glycopyrrolate o.d.) Using Tiotropium (18 Mcg o.d.) as an Active Control in Japanese Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)" },{ "PostingID": 16135, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A2307", "Description": "A Multicener, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study, to Assess the Long Term Safety of 52 Weeks Treatment With QVA149 (110 ug Indacaterol/50ug Glycopyrrolate) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)" },{ "PostingID": 16137, "Title": "NOVARTIS-CQVA149A2340", "Description": "A Multi-centre Randomized Double Blind 52-week Study to Assess the Safety of QVA149 Compared to QAB149 in Patients With COPD Who Have Moderate to Severe Airflow Limitation" }]
Statistical Analysis Plan
Following outcomes will be analyzed if data are available1. Trough FEV1 at the end of each study (defined as mean of FEV1 values obtained 23 and 24h after the previous day's dosing)2. Weighted mean FEV1 over 0-3h (or 0-12h) post-dose at the end of each study3. Trough forced vital capacity (FVC) at the end of each study4. Percentage of responders achieving an increase in trough FEV1 of ≥0.100 L above baseline at the end of each study5. Peak FEV1 (maximum FEV1 recorded over 0-3h post-dose time points) at the end of study6. Time to first COPD exacerbation7. Number of exacerbations during the study period8. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score 9. Proportion of SGRQ responders (defined as a decrease from baseline in SGRQ total score of 4 units or more) at the end of each study 10. Transition dyspnea index (TDI) focal score11. Proportion of TDI responders (defined as patients with a TDI focal score 1unit or higher)12. Adverse eventsStatistical analysisEfficacy analyses will be conducted on all patients meeting the criteria for our study patients; that is, 1) patients relocated from group D to group B, and 2) patients who would be indicated for dual bronchodilator use by the South Korean guidelines, but not by the 2017 GOLD guidelines). Trough FEV1 will be analyzed using a generalized linear mixed-model. Estimated treatment differences are presented as least squares means (LSM) with standard errors and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Other outcome measures will be analyzed in a similar way. Comparison of the time to a first COPD exacerbation will be analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model including treatment, smoking status, and other covariates. Categorical endpoints such as responders to TDI will be analyzed using a logistic regression including covariates of baseline score, smoking status, region and treatment.
Publication Citation
Kang, J., Lee, J.S., Lee, S.W. et al. Dual versus monotherapy with bronchodilators in GOLD group B COPD patients according to baseline FEV1 level: a patient-level pooled analysis of phase-3 randomized clinical trials. Respir Res 22, 55 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01648-5
© 2024 ideaPoint. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by ideaPoint.
Help
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Help and Resources