Just a moment, the page is loading...
Browse ALL STUDIES
Keyword Search
View All Selected
Clear All
Login / Create Account
Login
Create Account
Home
About Us
Privacy Policy
Minimum System Requirements
How To Join
Mission
Data Sponsors
Researchers
How It Works
How to Request Data
Review of Requests
Data Sharing Agreement
Access to Data
Independent Review Panel
Metrics
FAQs
News
Help/Contact Us
Outcome measures and baseline predictors of response to belimumab treatment.
Proposal
1695
Title of Proposed Research
Outcome measures and baseline predictors of response to belimumab treatment.
Lead Researcher
Ioannis Parodis
Affiliation
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Funding Source
None. In case we apply for funding that is approved we will acknowledge the funding source(s) in the respective publications.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Ioannis Parodis has received honoraria (related to SLE) from GSK. Laurent Arnaud has received honoraria (related to SLE) from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Springer. Ioannis Parodis has received honoraria (related to SLE) from GSK.
Data Sharing Agreement Date
21 September 2017
Lay Summary
Belimumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the soluble form of B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) approved for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, which patients are expected to best respond to this treatment has yet to be elucidated. In a recent report from real-life observations, high levels of BLyS have been implied to predict a good response while tobacco smoking and already established damage, previous venous thrombosis in particular, were shown to reduce the efficacy of the drug (Parodis I et al., Autoimmun Rev. 2017). A limitation of this report was the low number of patients observed. The phase III trials of belimumab constitute large cohorts of well-characterised patients with SLE receiving belimumab, and also provide a control group of patients receiving placebo facilitating comparisons. These cohorts could be used to validate the implications from the real-life observations, contributing to a better management of the patients with SLE and, more specifically, a better choice of patients who are expected to benefit from belimumab. Recently, a new definition was proposed for the characterisation of patients with low disease activity state, namely the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) (Franklyn K et al., Ann Rheum Dis. 2016). In the phase III clinical trials of belimumab, however, the SLE responder index (SRI) was used to identify responders to the treatment.
The aims of this project are to investigate whether measuring BLyS levels could provide physicians with guidance on whether belimumab is expected to be efficacious in specific cases, whether pre-existing organ damage predicts worse responses to treatment with belimumab, and whether tobacco smoking indeed reduces the efficacy of belimumab in larger SLE populations. Moreover, we aim to apply the more recent definition of lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and investigate whether belimumab is more effective than placebo in inducing low disease activity compared with the SLE responder index (SRI). The latter will contribute to the ongoing discussion about which definitions of response and low disease activity and/or remission are more applicable and more realistic to use in clinical trials and observational studies of SLE.
Either logistic or Cox regression models will be used to identify predictors of response and non-response to treatment with belimumab, and either regression models, mixed models, or the chi-square test will be used to investigate the rates of patients attaining LLDAS.
Experts in statistics will be consulted for the right choice of the tests. Experts in the field will participate in the interpretation of the results and their applicability and usefulness in clinical practice. Finally, the results and our conclusions will be communicated at scientific meetings and in research articles, which we will submit to scientific journals for peer review and publication.
Study Data Provided
[{ "PostingID": 1416, "Title": "GSK-HGS1006-C1056", "Description": "A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 76-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab (HGS1006, LymphoStat-B™), a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-BLyS Antibody, in Subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)" },{ "PostingID": 1417, "Title": "GSK-HGS1006-C1057", "Description": "A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Wk Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab (HGS1006, LymphoStat-B™), a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-BLyS Antibody, in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)" },{ "PostingID":19766,"Title":"GSK-BEL113750","Description":"GSK1550188 A 52 week study of belimumab versus placebo in the treatment of subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) located in Northeast Asia, Sponsor: GSK"},{"PostingID":20307,"Title":"GSK-BEL114333","Description":"A Phase 3, BEL114333, a Multicenter, Continuation Study of Belimumab in subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) who Completed the Phase III study BEL113750 in Northeast Asia or completed the open-label extension of HGS1006-C1115 in Japan, Sponsor: GSK"},{"PostingID":14488,"Title":"GSK-HGS1006-C1115","Description":"A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab (HGS1006) Administered Subcutaneously (SC) to Subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Sponsor: GSK"},{"PostingID":19767,"Title":"GSK-BEL112233","Description":"A Multi-Center, Continuation Trial of Belimumab (HGS1006, LymphoStat-B™), a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-BLyS Antibody, in Subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) who Completed the Phase 3 Protocol HGS1006-C1056 in the United States, Sponsor: GSK"},{"PostingID":20055,"Title":"GSK-BEL112234","Description":"A Multi-Center, Continuation Trial of Belimumab (HGS1006, LymphoStat-B™)a Fully Human Monoclonal Anti-BLyS Antibody in Subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) who completed the Phase 3 Protocol HGS1006-C1056 or HGS1006-C1057, Sponsor: GSK"}]
Statistical Analysis Plan
For the first part of the study, we will investigate specific items as predictors of response to treatment with belimumab. For this part, patients in the belimumab arms will be included in the analysis, and, most probably, the expert opinion will propose that only patients in the belimumab 10 mg/kg arm will be included in the analysis, as this dose received approval and is used in clinical practice. First, ROC-curve analysis could reveal whether the respective item is predictive of treatment response, and also help identify the optimal threshold value of the respective item showing best sensitivity and specificity for predicting the outcome. For example, ROC-curve analysis could result in the identification of an optimal cut-off baseline BLyS value. Then, we could proceed with predictive tests in order to calculate the positive and negative predictive values. The cut-off value can then be used for dichotomisation of the patients based on the baseline BLyS levels. This way, BLyS levels can be analysed in either logistic or Cox regression models (depending on whether the time to response should be part or the model according to the expert opinion and the statistician - this will be most probably dictated by how the dataset is built) not only as a continuous variable, which would only give implications of the value of baseline BLyS, but also as a categorical variable (below or under the optimal threshold). The latter gives a more straightforward message to the readership and can better be utilised by physicians treating patients with SLE. The smoking status is already a categorical variable, but could also be dichotomised as never smoker versus ever smokers, and never or former smokers versus current smokers. The organ damage will be categorised according to the expert opinion, based on relevant literature. For dichotomised variables, even the chi-square test might be used. In regression models, covariates will include age, sex, ethnicity, and other demographic characteristics, as well as clinical characteristics such as disease activity and disease duration. The dependent variables will be the clinical treatment outcome according to the SRI and possibly other measures, e.g. LLDAS and clinical SLEDAI=0.The LLDAS and clinical SLEDAI=0 will be applied to the dataset. In the second part of the study, all treatment arms (placebo, belimumab 1 mg/kg, and belimumab 10 mg/kg) will be used. First, response rates will be calculated using these outcome measures. To investigate whether the response rates differ between the different groups, we will make use of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test for non-related samples. Then, we will compare SDI, LLDAS and clinical SLEDAI=0 in terms of reproducibility of the results shown in the BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 trials. This part is mostly descriptive and the interpretation of the results will need expert opinion. For the evaluation of the effects of drug therapies, simple statistical methods like the Mann-Whitney U test will be used in order to identify differences between groups. Logistic regression will be used when adjustments for possible confounding factors have to be made, as appropriate. The SAS software provided from the data share system or the IBM SPSS software will be used for the statistical analyses.
Publication Citation
Ioannis Parodis, Sharzad Emamikia, Alvaro Gomez, Iva Gunnarsson, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven & Katerina Chatzidionysiou
(2018): Clinical SLEDAI-2K zero may be a pragmatic outcome measure in SLE studies, Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy,
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14712598.2019.1561856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214880
https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/rheumatology/kez191/5510116?guestAccessKey=3ad38e37-5e79-460f-af2b-37672a291dee
Antimalarial agents diminish while methotrexate, azathioprine and mycophenolic acid increase BAFF levels in systemic lupus erythematosus. Hernández-Breijo B, Gomez A, Soukka S, Johansson P, Parodis I.
Autoimmun Rev. 2019 Aug 10:102372. doi:
10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102372
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102372
https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa453
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061813
© 2024 ideaPoint. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by ideaPoint.
Help
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Help and Resources